<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top-10 Films of 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmcrusade.com/the-ten-best-films-of-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmcrusade.com/the-ten-best-films-of-2009/</link>
	<description>The Battle to Save Film</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 17:43:21 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alec</title>
		<link>http://www.filmcrusade.com/the-ten-best-films-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-745</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmcrusade.com/?p=1539#comment-745</guid>
		<description>&#039;Paranormal Activity&#039; at number 2? Please. The whole thing stank. How exactly can it be considered high concept when the concept has been streamlined into popular culture to the point of cliche?

&#039;Inglourious Basterds&#039; was good though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Paranormal Activity&#8217; at number 2? Please. The whole thing stank. How exactly can it be considered high concept when the concept has been streamlined into popular culture to the point of cliche?</p>
<p>&#8216;Inglourious Basterds&#8217; was good though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Long</title>
		<link>http://www.filmcrusade.com/the-ten-best-films-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-659</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Long</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 06:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmcrusade.com/?p=1539#comment-659</guid>
		<description>Good on you for putting Inglorious Basterds at #1 - the more I think about it, the more I&#039;m convinced it&#039;s one of the best of the decade. And I&#039;m one prone to downplay the quality of newer movies as compared to old ones. Great film.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good on you for putting Inglorious Basterds at #1 &#8211; the more I think about it, the more I&#8217;m convinced it&#8217;s one of the best of the decade. And I&#8217;m one prone to downplay the quality of newer movies as compared to old ones. Great film.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

